Independent Media Research

Steve Watson
http://infowars.net
Thursday, Feb 18th, 2010 A school district in Philadelphia faces a class action lawsuit after it allegedly issued laptop computers to 1,800 students across two high schools and then used concealed cameras within the machines to spy on students and their parents without their knowledge or consent.

Lower Merion School District in the suburbs of Philadelphia faces charges of invasion of privacy, theft of private information, and unlawful interception for providing computers with webcams that were remotely and covertly turned on by administrators.

The suit was brought on behalf of all the students and their parents after it was revealed that the computers had been used to monitor students both at school and at home.

The case, Blake J. Robbins v. Lower Merion School District (PDF), was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Tuesday, February 16, 2010.

According to the filing, the actions of the school district were exposed when one of the schools vice principals disciplined Mr Robbins son for improper behavior in his home, and used a photo taken from the computer camera as evidence.

Welcome to "Pentagon Style" Internet & The Next Level of Tyranny











Keywords: Alex Jones, Endgame, Infowars.com, Prison Planet TV, Pentagon, Internet, Martial Law, Police State, CCTV, Spying, Joe Stack, Austin Plane Crash, IRS, FBI, False Flag, JFK, RFK, MLK, Obama Deception, Fall Of The Republic, Revolution, Full Story

Stop the Wars, End the Fed, Regain our Liberties!

http://www.RonPaul.com

Stop preventive and undeclared wars, return to sound monetary policies, and promote freedom in all areas of your life, was the message of Ron Paul's annual CPAC address.

Ron Paul is America's leading voice for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies.

For more information visit the following sites:

http://www.RonPaul.com
http://www.CampaignForLiberty.com
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.DailyPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulForums.com

http://www.infowars.com/

Google and other powerful forces are testing the limits of Internet censorship on all conceivable fronts. Not only is content filtering taking place at a national and regional level, first in places like China, and now Australia, but policies limiting individual speech agreed upon at the corporate level and above are placed upon individuals.

Thus web participation is subject to a set of criteria. Vague terms like "anti" and "violence" have been used to block sites like Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com, though no specific complaint or 'charge' has been declared. In this case, Google's merchant policies have black listed Alex Jones and other outlets like him for unjustified reasons.

Its abuses may be partially cloaked behind its distinctions as a private business, but Google, expanding its domination of the web every day, has spread out and now controls many actions of individuals. Watch the video, and join Alex in fighting back against the incremental approach to control and censor the Internet. Keep the Internet free, and support the websites dedicated to exposing abuses and working towards free access, privacy and the uncontrolled flow of information, alternative news and communication.



Kurt Nimmo

Infowars

March 23, 2009

According to the great-grandson of John D. Rockefeller, nephew of banker David Rockefeller, and former Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller the internet represents a serious threat to national security. Rockefeller is not alone in this assessment. His belief that the internet is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair.

“It really almost makes you ask the question would it have been better if we had never invented the internet,” Rockefeller mused during the confirmation hearing of Gary Locke (see video), Obama’s choice for Commerce Secretary. He then cites a dubious figure of three million cyber “attacks” launched against the Department of Defense every day. “Everybody is attacked, anybody can do it. People say, well it’s China and Russia, but there could be some kid in Latvia doing the same thing.”

Jay Rockefeller’s comments reveal an astounding degree of ignorance – or if not ignorance, outright propaganda. Since the September 11, 2001, attacks the government has cranked up the fear quotient in regard to cyber attacks and so-called cyber terrorism, a virtually non-existent threat except in the minds security experts and politicians. In the years since the attacks, not one real instance of real cyberterrorism has been recorded.

“Cyberattacks on critical components of the national infrastructure are not uncommon, but they have not been conducted by terrorists and have not sought to inflict the kind of damage that would qualify as cyberterrorism,” writes Gabriel Weimann, author of Terror on the Internet. “Nuclear weapons and other sensitive military systems, as well as the computer systems of the CIA and FBI, are ‘air-gapped,’ making them inaccessible to outside hackers. Systems in the private sector tend to be less well protected, but they are far from defenseless, and nightmarish tales of their vulnerability tend to be largely apocryphal.”

Senator Jay Rockefeller pontificates on the threat to national security posed by the internet.

“Psychological, political, and economic forces have combined to promote the fear of cyberterrorism,” Weimann continues. “From a psychological perspective, two of the greatest fears of modern time are combined in the term ‘cyberterrorism.’ The fear of random, violent victimization blends well with the distrust and outright fear of computer technology.”

“The sky is not falling, and cyber-weapons seem to be of limited value in attacking national power or intimidating citizens,” notes James Lewis of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Such a threat is overblown, Lewis explains. He notes that “a brief review suggests that while many computer networks remain very vulnerable to attack, few critical infrastructures are equally vulnerable.” In other words, Rockefeller’s example of a kid in Latvia with a laptop posing a serious “hazard” to national security is little more than sensationalistic propaganda.

So-called cyber terrorists are far less of a threat than government. China and Australia have recently imposed draconian censorship on internet freedom. Brazil, Denmark, Canada, Finland, Ireland , Italy, Israel, the United Kingdom, the United States, and many other countries also impose nominal censorship on internet freedom. Urgent calls to restrict the medium in various ways through legislation and government action have increased over the last few years (for more detail, see Internet Censorship: A Comparative Study).

However, the real threat to internet freedom is currently posed by IT and ISP corporations, not the government.

The Alex Jones Show, June 11, 2008: : Death of the Internet. Part 2

As Alex Jones explained last June, large corporate ISPs are now in the process of imposing bandwidth caps and routing traffic over their networks and blocking certain targeted websites. For instance, in 2005 AOL Time-Warner was caught blocking access to all of Jones’ flagship websites across the entire United States. Other instances of outright censorship include the UK ISP Tiscali blocking subscribers from reaching material on the 7/7 London bombings and Google’s continued and habitual censorship of 9/11 material and Alex Jones’ films on the ever-popular YouTube. There are many other instances as well. (See Censoring the Internet: A Collection of Essential Links on Infowars.)

Jay Rockefeller’s warning about virtually non-existent and largely absurd cyberterrorism reveals increasing government nervousness and apprehension about the medium as a whole, especially as the internet grows by leaps and bounds as an alternative news and activism medium. On numerous occasions over the last few years alternative websites have posted articles exposing government crime, articles the corporate media has largely ignored. During the Bush years, the internet served as a vital resource for information on everything from torture and the destruction of civil liberties to the invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, information the corporate media was often unable or unwilling to carry.

For instance, earlier this month Infowars broke a story concerning the Missouri Information Analysis Center and its effort to profile Libertarians and Ron Paul supporters as terrorists. The story was subsequently picked up by the corporate media (although Alex Jones and Infowars did not receive attribution).

As more corporate media outlets fail — as evinced by several high profile newspapers going out of business recently — and more people flock to the internet to get their news and information, the government will increasingly employ fear tactics designed to portray the medium as a refuge for terrorists, pedophiles, and other miscreants.

It appears the Obama administration is attempting to micromanage this effort. Last week CNet “obtained a summary of a proposal from Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) that would create an Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor, part of the Executive Office of the President. That office would receive the power to disconnect, if it believes they’re at risk of a cyberattack, ‘critical’ computer networks from the Internet.” As well, the effort would put the White House National Cybersecurity Advisor in charge of coordinating cyber efforts within the intelligence community and within civilian agencies.

AIPAC Runs America's Foreign Policy
Alex welcomes courageous former Congressman James Traficant, who was railroaded and imprisoned for seven years after a tax battle with the IRS.
http://thememoryhole.org/traficant/
http://prisonplanet.tv/







James Traficant's error wasn't committing fraud and taking money. His error was doing it old style. While other politicians had moved up to sophisticated methods including campaign donations, speaking fees, book advances and other hidden ways, Traficant stayed true to his suitcase full of cash roots.

Look at the Government that is kicking him out. The top cop in our land Ashcroft is
so popular when he ran for the senate, he lost to a dead man. Our president, who did
not win the majority of votes, is scared to pass tough corporate crime laws because the
vice president, ground hog Cheney, will have to go to jail. Our vice president did
an advertisement for Arthur Anderson where he expressed how happy he was with their
creative accounting. He now only makes money raising appearances and the pops back
down his hole for 6 more days of running the secret government.

Congress is no better. They didn't kick him out because he committed a crime, they
would all be out on the street if that was the issue. They kicked him out because he got
caught.

The FBI and US courts wanted him so bad, they refused him witnesses, made deals with men
who committed more serious crimes for their testimony and as one witness now admits,
goaded false testimony out of their witnesses.

The man was one of the few things right about congress, as down to earth and as simple as
the tax code he championed. He didn't dress up ideas and issues in a million miles
of BS, he spoke plainly, simply and with more honesty than congress will see in the next
100 years.

James Trafficant Bio

Our Traficant Quote Database.

CNN
Archives On Traficant

Great
Traficant Info
http://www.freetraficant.com/

Keywords: AIPAC, Israel, Ariel Sharon, Rahm Emanuel, Barrack Obama, United States Of America, Police State, Tyranny, Secret Government, Supreme Court, Prison System, Public Affairs, Antisemitism, IRS, Foreign Policy, Mossad, War, 9/11, Liberty, Alex Jones, Endgame, Terrorstorm, Martial Law

Source: FBI Knew Austin Attack Was Coming

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, February 18, 2010

A trusted source has told this office that the FBI knew Austin was going to be attacked today and had dispatched officers from its Dallas headquarters yesterday afternoon to be in place for todays incident.

The source claims that a confidential memo was circulated yesterday detailing that a building in Austin was going to be the target of an attack today. He was told this by an informant who works in the Dallas FBI office.

Four FBI agents hurriedly left the Dallas office yesterday to be ready and on the scene for the aftermath of the incident, according to the informant, who was shaken when he saw events unfolding today and put two and two together.

We cannot confirm the accuracy of the claim but the source is known to us and has no motivation for inventing the story.

The fact that pilot Joe Stack changed his manifesto at least 27 times before the final version suggests that he had been writing it for days and this could have been what tipped off the FBI in the build up to the attack.

The claim dovetails with reports we are receiving from Austin residents that the FBI were immediately on the scene after the plane crash and were filming both the building and eyewitnesses.

A separate witness told KXAN News that there were Hazmat teams and fire trucks in place across the street before the plane struck the building.

Infowars reporters who spoke to neighbors at Stacks house, which he had burned down before crashing the plane, expressed surprise at how quick emergency services responded to the fire. One neighbor, named Elbert, said that emergency crews arrived five minutes after he made the 911 call.

Whether the attack was the work of a lone individual or part of a larger set-up, the aftermath is being exploited to the full by the corporate media and people like Glenn Beck, who are blaming the incident on Constitutionalists and the liberty movement, implying that anyone who shares any of the grievances outlined in Stacks lengthy manifesto are also intent on crashing planes into buildings.

Of course, the previous staged terror attack, the Christmas Day underwear bomber incident, was proven to be a set-up and the authorities repeatedly had to change their cover story after eyewitness Kurt Haskell, who was initially derided by the media, was eventually proven right in the fact that the bomber was allowed to board Flight 253 by order of the State Department.

Authorities were similarly prepared in advance of the 9/11 attacks in New York City. As part of the Tripod II exercise, FEMA deployed on September 10 to set up a command post at Pier 29 supposedly in preparation for a biowarfare exercise scheduled for September 12.

We are providing the following tip line for people in Austin to send their eyewitness and news tips about this incident to us.

The number is 512-646-4444.
http://www.infowars.com/source-fbi-kn...








IRS Plane Attack Witness Describes Fireball, Explosion, Shockwave.


VIOLENCE IS NOT THE ANSWER.
Said one witness, a former pilot: "It was a really speedy dive. It (hit) between the first and second floors in Echelon I. A gigantic fireball came out about 50 feet wide, the windows blew out. It was a whoosh, a roar and a boom." http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/local/th...

"Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, lets try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well."
Andrew Joseph Stack Possible Suicide Blog: REPOSTED: http://www.infowars.com/austin-suicid...
REMOVED: http://embeddedart.com/ Attention:

I DO NOT CONDONE THIS MAN'S ACTIONS, I DO want to make sure the whole story is put out. there are reports of a 40-50 ft. fireball (Fox News eyewitness interview with the lady in red), and if you look at the building, there is more damage than the Pentagon on 9/11. Said one witness, a former pilot: "It was a really speedy dive. It (hit) between the first and second floors in Echelon I. A gigantic fireball came out about 50 feet wide, the windows blew out. It was a whoosh, a roar and a boom." http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/local/th...

AUSTIN, Texas Pilot Attacks IRS, CIA Office Building (Echelon II) In Austin, Texas 2/18/2010 Receiving reports the pilot burned down his home before takeoff, then the pilot flew it directly into the building, housing IRS & CIA offices. An FBI Office sits next door. UPDATE: CNN is now reporting that Andrew Joseph Stack, a registered pilot and plane owner, allegedly set his house on fire this morning and is suspected of being the pilot who hit the building. The IRS and the CIA all have offices in that office complex, witnesses say. The Internal Revenue Service has 199 employees in the building and they are currently being accounted for, IRS officials said. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is "aware" of the crash, federal officials said. Upon hearing of the crash, the Pentagon sent two F-16s to Texas to investigate. "At this time, we have no reason to believe there is a nexus to criminal or terrorist activity. We are in the process of coordinating with the state officials and other federal partners to gather more information, and at this time we will defer additional questions to local officials and the FAA," said Matt Chandler of the Department of Homeland Security. The collision shook the entire building, and the entire front of the structure is gone and on fire, according to emails being reported from inside the building. Several witnesses are reporting they first thought it was a bomb. Emergency crews are doing a roll call on the scene to account for people in the building. There are four separate fires burning in the building. Some 50 to 100 people are outside watching, and the entire building from the second to fourth floor is on fire. FBI officials officed in a next-door building began immediately interviewing witnesses. "It hit the building next door. All FBI personnel are safe. We are helping local PD and Fire determine what happened. Nothing to indicate we were targeted," said Erik Vasys with FBI in San Antonio. A low-flying small plane crashed into the Echelon II office building that houses the Internal Revenue Service Thursday in Austin and at least one person was missing, witnesses and officials said. Assistant Austin Fire Chief Harry Evans said two people have also been taken to a hospital. Their conditions were not immediately known. It felt like a bomb blew off. The ceiling caved in and windows blew in. We got up and ran, she said. Matt Farney, 39, who was in the parking lot of a nearby Home Depot, said he saw a low-flying private plane near some apartments and the office building just before it crashed. Early reports that the building housed the FBI field office in Austin later turned out not to be true. An FBI spokesman told Fox News that the FBI office in Austin is near where the plane crashed, but not in the same building. There are some federal offices in the building, though authorities couldn't identify which ones. http://www.txcn.com/sharedcontent/dws...

♞▬ ↑ΠF☼ЯM@╫↑☼Π ЯΞ(LΩ√Ξ)U╫↑☼Π ▬♞ http://youtube.com/HorseofPaulRevere http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
Run Horse Run

Alex welcomes back to the show author, former regional sports presenter for the BBC and spokesman for the British Green Party, and renowned critic of the New World Order, David Icke.
http://www.davidicke.com/index.php/
http://prisonplanet.tv/







The Global Awakening
David Icke explains how the panic-stricken elite are desperate to put the lid back on a global awakening that is stalling their agenda for world domination.
http://prisonplanet.tv/



Keywords: New World Order, One World Government, Problem Reaction Solution, Global Warming, Climate Gate, Truth Movement, Alternative Entertainment, Royal Bloodline, FOX News, CIA, FBI, ATF, Global Awakening, Necons, False Flag Attack, United Nations, Internet, Cybersecurity, Al Gore, Scam, Fraud, Monetary System, Tyranny, Police State, Religion, Vatican, Perception, Deception, Control System, Power

http://www.infowars.com/

Sarah Palin 9/11 Truther Controversy Explodes

Days after Debra Medina's rising bid for Texas Governor was stung by controversy over comments about 9/11 on the Glenn Beck Show, it has emerged that former Vice Presidential candidate and "Tea Party' darling Sarah Palin has done her one better-- stating her support for a new 9/11 investigation just before the 2008 election, and going far beyond Medina's mild statement.

Yet, it isn't the audacity to admit there are remaining questions about 9/11 when scientific polls have found that 84% of Americans do not believe the official story and six of the ten 9/11 commissioners think their own report is flawed, or worse. Instead, it is the hypocrisy of Glenn Beck and the media cretins who followed his lead in dismissing and defaming Medina outright for not immediately belittling 9/11 truthers and ignoring similar statements by GOP darling Sarah Palin.

Furthermore, Medina's GOP challengers-- incumbent Rick Perry and Sen. Hutchison blasted her in the media within mere minutes of her 9/11 comments.

Sitting Governor Perry, who was endorsed by Sarah Palin during a recent stump appearance, stated that Medina's comments were an "insult": Todays comments were an insult to the thousands of Americans who lost loved ones on Sept. 11 and the military men and women who are overseas protecting our country, Perry said in a statement. President Bush worked tirelessly to protect our nation from additional terrorist attacks and anyone who would suggest Sept. 11 is a conspiracy involving the Bush administration should be ashamed.
Will Gov. Rick Perry also rebuke Sarah Palin, his top endorsement, for her potentially "insulting" statement?
Further, Medina is not the only gubernatorial candidate to question the events of 9/11. Democrat Farouk Shami went quite a bit further than anything Medina had said when he stated:

People have talked about it. Professors have written books about it. People overseas talk about it. Whenever I go overseas, people ask me these questions about it. Why are we questioned about it? Do they know something we dont know, the public? But you know, look, we still dont know who killed JFK whose behind it, lets put it that way. Would we ever find the truth about 9/11? Thats a very dangerous subject to get into, you know? So its hard to make judgement. Im not saying yes or no. Because I dont know the truth.
Yet no fuss is made about these individuals. Debra Medina is attacked, however, because she truly is a threat to the political establishment. Perry, Hutchison, Beck and others pretend to want limited government, but really support new taxes, look the other way at corporate looting and otherwise refuse to stand for true Texas sovereignty and the rights of individuals. When Medina proves that she really will change things and challenge under Federal powers, she is attacks and cast aside as a pariah.

Glenn Beck, who has stated that he "hates the 9/11 victim's families", who has called 9/11 truthers "dangerous anarchists", who has called Ron Paul and his supporters 'domestic terrorists', has gone out of his way to politically assassinate anyone even loosely affiliated with questioning the official government account of September 11. Now that Beck has underhandedly tried to sabotage Debra Medina, will he also call out fellow FOX News personality Sarah Palin for daring to broach the subject that makes him come unglued?

Link: PP.com Palin new investigation...

After all, Glenn Beck went so far as to say that Medina's comments about 9/11 not only urge him to 'cross her off the list' but constitute to make her a "Flat Earther." By contrast, Glenn Beck gave Sarah Palin a worshipful welcome to the FOX Network, embarrassingly comparing her to George Washington, reading aloud his diary entry anticipating their interview together, putting her "on the most admired list" and otherwise urging her to be a 'reluctant' candidate in 2012.

Glenn Beck Calls Sarah Palin A Nazi, Fascist, Anarchist, Crazy Person Who Doesn't Like America


Glenn Beck interviewing Republican Texas gubernatorial candidate Debra Medina, Thursday, Feb. 11, 2010.


Keywords: Alex Jones, Infowars.com, Prison Planet, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, 9/11, Debra Medina, Governor, Texas, Rick Perry, 10th Amendment, Senator, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Farouk Shami, Bill White, GOP, Democrat, Fake Conservative, Glenn Beck, Banker Bail Out, Ron Paul

HyperInflation; The Bond Market
Alex talks with author, journalist, lecturer, and GCN talk show host Webster Griffin Tarpley. Webster's latest book, Obama - The Postmodern Coup, is available from Alex Jones' Infowars Store.
http://prisonplanet.tv/
http://www.tarpley.net/






Keywords: Barrack Obama, The Postmodern Coup, Obama Deception, Fall Of The Republic, Webster Tarpley Interview, Bail Out, Left Right Paradigm, Economy, Depression, Finacial Collapse, Federal Reserve Bank, Criminal Bankers, Audit The Fed, One World Government, New World Order, Alex Jones TV, Prison Planet, Infowars

Alex breaks down what he thinks is the next real false flag attack on america, and it's going to be none other then obama himself. Alex breaks down the key points from those who have been talking about this, and where they are leading their viewers. Very important topic today, so please share with everyone you know, because time is very short right now.
http://prisonplanet.tv/
http://www.infowars.com








Keywords: Russia Today, Paul Craig Roberts, Police State, False Flag Attack, 9/11, Terrorism, Alex Jones, Endgame, Terrorstorm, Martial Law, Barack Obama Cnn, Fox, Glenn Beck, Agent, Cointelpro, Sarah Palin, Mainstream TV, Climate Gate, Sy-Op, Al Qaeda, White House, 9/11 Truther

Alex breaks down the latest attack by Glenn Beck & Newsweek Magazine on Debra Medina, Alex Jones and the truth movement.
http://prisonplanet.tv/
http://www.infowars.com



Keywords: Debra Medina, Glenn Beck, Barrack Obama, Precidency, Hit Piece, 9/11 Truth, Truthers, False Flag Attack, Texas, Nashville, Obama Deception, New World Order, Global Slavery, Socialism, False Prophets, United Nations, Conspiracy, Birth Certificate, Climate Gate, Global Warming Fraud, Goldman Sachs, Health Plan

A native of , Texas, Jim Marrs earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in journalism from the University of North Texas, and attended Graduate School at Texas Tech in Lubbock. He worked for several Texas news-papers from 1968 to 1980, with a brief leave to serve in the Fourth Army intelligence unit during the Viet Nam War. In 1989, his book "Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy" was published, and was on the New York Times Best Seller list for 6 weeks in 1992. It became the basis for the Oliver Stone film "JFK". In 1992, Jim began three years' research and completed a non-fiction book on the psychic phenomenon known as remote viewing, only to have it mysteriously canceled as it was going to press. "Psi Spies" was finally published in 2000. In 1997, Marrs' in-depth investigation of UFOs, "Alien Agenda" was published.

This is Jim Marrs's Documentary The Secret Of Redgate. The incredible story of one small community in Montana which has had ongoing experiences with UFOs for more than 50 years.

Use Of Remote Viewing To Find Information About ETs

Alex welcomes back to the show Jim Marrs, renowned author of The Rise of the Fourth Reich, JFK assassination researcher, and former newspaper journalist. Other guests include author, photographer, and JFK assassination researcher Robert J. Groden and evangelist Darrel Rundus. Alex Jones also discusses the issues of the day and takes your calls. Running Time: 1h58min

Alex Jones Show 11-20-08 With Jim Marrs and Robert J. Groden


Keywords: New World Order, Federal Reserve Bank, Money, Cash, John F. Kennedy Assassination, Zapruder Film, Secret Government, Secret Society, Local Government, Local Economy, Tyranny, Bilderberg Group, Jim Tucker, United Nations, War, False Flag Attacks, George W. Bush, Carbon Tax, Al Gore, Glimate Change, Climate Gate, Economic Collapse, Free Market, Control Grid, Big Brother, Sheep, Slavery, Police State

Jim Marrs in studio with Alex Jones and Jason Bermas in two seperate interviews. I always enjoyed listening to Jim Marrs because he's very calm unlike Alex who yells a lot lol. They go over a lot of topics like the New World Order, Secret Reports, Barrack Obama, Change, Global Banking Elite, White House, Wanted War Criminal Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Council Of Foreign Relations, John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon and a lot more. Listen to and watch Jim Marrs explaining how and why the real criminals try to criminalize people on the Alex Jones Show. Running Time: 1h41min.

Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America


The Puppet Masters

Laughlin, Nevada, February 2009

http://projectcamelot.org/jim_marrs.html

Jim Marrs - an amiable Texan with twinkling eyes and a mind like a steel trap - is a veteran researcher and speaker on all topics connected with the agenda of the New World Order. Project Camelot is proud to add him to our strong cadre of witnesses.

The books that Jim has authored represent his range of interests clearly: Crossfire (about JFK), Alien Agenda, Rule by Secrecy, The Terror Conspiracy, PSI Spies, The Rise of the Fourth Reich, and Above Top Secret. Jim's broad span of research encompasses Egyptian and Sumerian mythology, Nazi technology, the ET presence, modern geopolitical analysis, the power of the military-industrial complex, the Illuminati, and what one might call the real history of the twentieth century.

Jim sees the big picture clearly, has great command of detail, and is one of the strongest speakers on the lecture circuit today. The title of this video - The Rise of the Fourth Reich in America - tells its own story, and in this 75 minute interview Jim lays out the compelling and disturbing evidence that while most people thought the Second World War ended in 1945, the Nazis were never stopped in their agenda - which can only be understood when one considers how they were assisted in coming to power by those Controllers who plan in terms of generations... not terms of government office.

To contact Bill Ryan or Kerry Cassidy, please e-mail us at support@projectcamelot.org.

Project Camelot Interview


Rule by Secrecy

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/04/permission-needed-to-kill-american-terrorists/

Globalization Is Killing The Globe: Return to Local Economies

Thom Hartmann

OpEd News

February 9, 2010

Globalization is killing Europe, just as it’s already wiped out much of the American middle class.

Spain and Greece are facing immediate crises that many other European nations see on the near horizon: aging boomer workers are retiring with healthy benefit packages, but the younger workers who are paying for those benefits aren’t making anything close to the income (or, therefore, paying the taxes) that their parents did.

Globalists/corporatists/conservative “free market” and “flat earth” advocates say this is a great opportunity to cut benefits for the old folks (and for the young folks in the future), thus bringing the countries budgets back into balance, and this story is the main corporate media storyline.

But it overlooks the real issue (and the real solution): how globalization is killing these nations’ economies and what can be done about it.

From the days of Adam Smith, classical economics pointed out that manufacturing and extraction are the only two ways to “create wealth.”

“Wealth” is different from “income.” Wealth is value, which endures at least for some time. Income is simply compensation for work. If you wash my car for $10 and I mow your lawn for $10, we have a GDP of $20 and it looks like we both have income and economic activity. But no wealth has been created, just income.

On the other hand, if I build your car, I’m creating something of value. And if you turn my lawn into a small farm that produces food we can all eat, you’re creating something of value. Not only do we have an “economy” with a “GDP,” we also have created wealth.

A stick on the ground has no commercial value, but if you add labor to it by carving it into an axe handle — a thing of commercial value — you have “created wealth.” Similarly, metals in the ground have no commercial value, but when you add labor to them by extracting, refining, and forming them into products, you “create wealth.” Even turning seeds and dirt and cows into hamburgers is a form of manufacturing and creates wealth.

This is the “Wealth of Nations” that titled Adam Smith’s famous 1776 book.

On the other hand, when a trader at Goldman Sachs makes a “profit” trading stocks, bonds, or currencies, no wealth whatsoever is created. In fact, to the extent that that trader takes millions in commissions, pay, and bonuses, he’s actually depleting the wealth of the nation (particularly to the extent that he moves his money offshore to save or invest, as many do).

To use the United States as an example, in the late 1940s and early 1950s manufacturing accounted for a high of 28 percent of our total gross domestic product (and much of the rest of the economy like agriculture that, in a classical sense is “manufacturing” wasn’t even included in those numbers), and when Reagan came into office it was at a strong 20 percent. Today it’s about ten percent of our GDP.

What this means is that we’re creating less wealth here, because we’re not making much anymore. (And the biggest growth in American manufacturing has been in the military sector, where goods are made that are then destroyed when they explode over foreign cities, causing even more of our wealth to vanish.)

The main effect of the globalism fad of the past 30 yearrs — lowering the protective barriers to trade that countries for centuries have used to make sure their own local economies are self-sufficient — has been to ship manufacturing (the creation of wealth) from developed nations to developing nations. Transnational corporations love this, because in countries with lower labor costs and few environmental and safety regulations, it’s more profitable to manufacture products. They then sell those products in the “mature” countries — the places that used to manufacture — and people burn through the wealth they’d accumulated in the earlier manufacturing days (home equity, principally, along with savings and lines of credit) to buy these foreign-manufactured goods.

At first, it looks like a good deal to consumers in developed nations. Goods are cheaper! But over a decade or two or three, as the creation of real wealth is reduced and the residue of the old wealth is spent, the developed nations become progressively poorer and poorer. At the same time, the “developing” nations become wealthier — because those are the places that are producing real wealth.

So they tell us that instead of putting back into place tariffs, domestic content laws, and other “protectionist” policies that built America from the time the were first proposed by Alexander Hamilton in 1791 (and largely adopted by Congress in 1793) until they were dismantled by Reagan/Bush/Clinton/Bush, we should instead simple “accept the reality” that we’re “living beyond our means” and we have to “cut back our wages and social programs.”

In other words, they get richer, our nations become poorer, and national sovereignty is reduced.

Nations — and in large countries like the USA, even states — must again rebuild their manufacturing base and become locally self-sufficient, so their own consumers are buying products manufactured by their own workers.

“But won’t that make Wal-Mart’s stuff more expensive?” whine the flat-earthers.

Yes, it will. But most Americans (and Greeks and Spaniards) would gladly pay 10 percent more for the goods in their stores if their paychecks were 20 percent higher. And manufacturing paychecks have always been higher, because manufacturing is where “true wealth” is generated (thus the basis for most union movements, which further guarantee healthy worker income and benefits).

The transnational corporations benefiting from globalization are also, in most cases, the transnational corporations that own our media, so even the word globalization is rarely heard in reports on economic crises around the world.

But globalization is the villain here, and one that needs to be taken in hand and brought under control quickly if we don’t want to see virtually the nations of the world end up subservient to corporate control, a new form of an ancient economic system known as feudalism.

READ FULL ARTICLE

My Comment
As you may know i live in switzerland witch is a pretty small country compared to others like the united states. Just comparing switzerland with new york witch is a state right? Now think about how big the united states are. Can one guy be there for all people at the same time? No. Can one guy control them all? No.
So why do they put one guy on top? That's very stupid imo. Even state governors can't handle a single state on their own. We need to get back to a local system. And if every town has different ruels and laws then so be it! If we have real police officers (friend and helper!) instead of law enforcers then we would actually have a community again. Did ever wonder why people won't talk to each other? Not even their own neighbours. It's time for people to speak up and talk about all issues. The people have the last word.

26 Jan 2010 19:30:32 GMT
Source: Reuters
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE60P2MD.htm

DAVOS, Jan 26 (Reuters) - The police commander heading security at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland was found dead on Tuesday, local authorities said, adding that his death appeared to be suicide.

Markus Reinhardt, head of police in the Swiss canton of Graubuenden, was found dead in his hotel in Davos, police said in a statement on their website.

"All indications point to a suicide," the statement said.

WEF founder and executive founder Klaus Schwab said in a statement that the organisers appreciated Reinhardt's professionalism and kindness over years of co-operation.

"The Security Forces continue to have our full confidence and trust in their work," the statement said.

Reinhardt, 61, had headed the canton's police force since 1984. (Reporting by Sven Egenter; Editing by Dominic Evans)

My Comment:
I heard Wayne Madsen talk about this on the Alex Jones Show today click here to watch the video.
There is definitely something fishy going on here. If you're 61 years old and you're the head of security, you don't commit suicide just like that. If it really was susicide then there must've been a reason for it. But did you ever heard of a security officer, committing suicide in a hotel room, when he should've been doing his job? I don't think so. He could've done it at home or at the office but at a hotel room?

Federal Judge in Germany: Numerous 9/11 Theories Screaming For Investigation

Washington’s Blog

December 15, 2009

The Supreme Court has just ruled that four Guantanamo prisoners cannot sue the government for torture. The Center for Constitutional Rights notes:

It is an awful day for the rule of law and common decency when the Supreme Court lets stand such an inhuman decision. The final word on whether these men had a right not to be tortured or a right to practice their religion free from abuse is that they did not. Future prospective torturers can now draw comfort from this decision. The lower court found that torture is all in a days’ work for the Secretary of Defense and senior generals. That violates the President’s stated policy, our treaty obligations and universal legal norms. Yet the Obama administration, in its rush to protect executive power, lost its moral compass and persuaded the Supreme Court to avoid a central moral challenge. Today our standing in the world has suffered a further great loss.

As Raw Story notes, this means that torture could return.

In fact, torture is a violation of both international and American law. Specifically, the Geneva Convention makes it illegal to inflict mental or physical torture or inhuman treatment.

Torture Is Still – In Fact – Illegal

As I pointed out in 2005:

The War Crimes Act of 1996, a federal statute set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 2441, makes it a federal crime for any U.S. national, whether military or civilian, to violate the Geneva Convention by engaging in murder, torture, or inhuman treatment.

The statute applies not only to those who carry out the acts, but also to those who ORDER IT, know about it, or fail to take steps to stop it. The statute applies to everyone, no matter how high and mighty.

***

Indeed, even the lawyers and other people who aided in the effort may be war criminals; see also this article , this one, and this press release.

The Military Commissions Act of 2006 limited the applicability of the War Crimes Act, but still made the following unlawful: torture, cruel or inhumane treatment, murder, mutilation or maiming, intentionally causing serious bodily harm, rape, sexual assault or abuse.

Is Torture a Necessary Evil?

Let’s not let a little bit of law get in the way. Many would say that torture is a necessary evil to defend our national security.

But as I have previously demonstrated:

• Torture doesn’t work in providing information which will keep us safe

• Torture actually reduces our national security

• Most of those tortured were innocent

• Torture has also been used throughout history as a form of intimidation, to terrorize people into obedience, not for gathering information

Moreover, the type of torture used by the U.S. in the last 10 years is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed that the U.S. used torture techniques aimed at extracting false confessions.

McClatchy fills in some of the details:

Former senior U.S. intelligence official familiar with the interrogation issue said that Cheney and former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld demanded that the interrogators find evidence of al Qaida-Iraq collaboration…

For most of 2002 and into 2003, Cheney and Rumsfeld, especially, were also demanding proof of the links between al Qaida and Iraq that (former Iraqi exile leader Ahmed) Chalabi and others had told them were there.”

It was during this period that CIA interrogators waterboarded two alleged top al Qaida detainees repeatedly — Abu Zubaydah at least 83 times in August 2002 and Khalid Sheik Muhammed 183 times in March 2003 — according to a newly released Justice Department document…

When people kept coming up empty, they were told by Cheney’s and Rumsfeld’s people to push harder,” he continued.”Cheney’s and Rumsfeld’s people were told repeatedly, by CIA . . . and by others, that there wasn’t any reliable intelligence that pointed to operational ties between bin Laden and Saddam . . .

A former U.S. Army psychiatrist, Maj. Charles Burney, told Army investigators in 2006 that interrogators at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention facility were under “pressure” to produce evidence of ties between al Qaida and Iraq.

“While we were there a large part of the time we were focused on trying to establish a link between al Qaida and Iraq and we were not successful in establishing a link between al Qaida and Iraq,” Burney told staff of the Army Inspector General. “The more frustrated people got in not being able to establish that link . . . there was more and more pressure to resort to measures that might produce more immediate results.”

“I think it’s obvious that the administration was scrambling then to try to find a connection, a link (between al Qaida and Iraq),” [Senator] Levin said in a conference call with reporters. “They made out links where they didn’t exist.”

Levin recalled Cheney’s assertions that a senior Iraqi intelligence officer had met Mohammad Atta, the leader of the 9/11 hijackers, in the Czech Republic capital of Prague just months before the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

The FBI and CIA found that no such meeting occurred.

In other words, top Bush administration officials not only knowingly lied about a non-existent connection between Al Qaida and Iraq, but they pushed and insisted that interrogators use special torture methods aimed at extracting false confessions to attempt to create such a false linkage. See also this and this.

Paul Krugman summarized eloquently summarized the truth about the type of torture used:

Let’s say this slowly: the Bush administration wanted to use 9/11 as a pretext to invade Iraq, even though Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. So it tortured people to make them confess to the nonexistent link.

There’s a word for this: it’s evil.

Illegal … check. Unnecessary … check.

Why hasn’t America banned torture?